Political comments

One of my readers has commented that he is surprised I haven’t written more political stuff.  Probably because I am such a political person.  This year will probably bring more politics to my blogs, though I expect to continue to write about music, and other topics that interest me.  But it is a political year, so no doubt I won’t be able to keep my mouth shut.  And that will lead me into several debates.

These comments are specific to the South Carolina Republican primaries.  The results with the Catholic adulterer winning out over the Mormon elitist don’t make a lot of sense to me, but then, had it gone the other way, I don’t know how I would have thought.  This is one of the two most christian states in the Bible Belt, and two of the states most fought in and over during the Civil War.  Mississippi is known to be the worst over civil rights, and Alabama had its own horrific events, but the carpetbaggers were most active in South Carolina and Georgia are where the biggest actions were, and where it went hardest when the Union won.  I think a lot of this carries over.

But here is the conundrum to me:  the most active christians are those who think sex is a punishment for what they call original sin.  And yet they would choose an adulterer, not just once, but at least twice, or at least against two women.  But then I remember that christianity is a male-centric religion, which keeps women as second-class citizens, and women who kowtow to their husbands, accept their “rightful” place in his world, are more likely to forgive Newt, or at least ignore his “little” wanderings.  They are of the lot who say “hey, he’s a man, what do you expect?” frame of mind.  So they might not hold his past against him – forgive and forget, perhaps.

But Newt has more against him than just his philandering, and that is that he lost his seat as speaker of the house, and was drummed out of office, either by someone else, or by his own choice to not run again.  I forget which it was.  I just know there has been a lot of “scandal” around him.  And then he did get the Rick Perry backers, even if it was just 5%, and that in itself was a comic opera to me – Rick Perry, the pious, the prayer-maker, backed Newt Gingrich, and his own followers did what he told them to.

Mitt Romney, on the other hand, is a Mormon, which many folks consider to not be a christian organization, in spite of Joseph Smith saying Jesus appeared to him in New Hampshire and told him to go forth and create this huge religion (even if it did originally come from England).  The Mormons did not recognize the black race until the mid-70s, so one would think the black population would not vote for him.  But then, so much of the black population in South Carolina follow the teachings of the Southern Baptists that maybe they think Newt Gingrich was a better choice than Mitt Romney.  Certainly Mitt himself has no clue how to approach and/or talk to the middle class, much less the poor, of which South Carolina and the other southern states of the Bible Belt have perhaps the greatest population.

So who might I have suspected would win South Carolina?  I think perhaps my prediction, had I made one, have been for Ron Paul.  I would have thought Rick Perry would have had the most support there, had he not canceled his run, but then I learned that he had only 5% of the polls, and so I am just puzzled.  Maybe it was just enough that Newt Gingrich is from the south, and that is why he was chosen.

Well, I leave this post with confusion, and perhaps confusing a few of you, and wait to see what Florida will do, and then the next state and then the next.  But I have to say that after three primaries, three different men have ended up at the top – Iowa for Santorum, New Hampshire for Romney, and South Carolina for Gingrich.  And with Gingrich and Romney battling one another, perhaps on even ground, for Florida.

The Republican convention looks to be an arena where there will be heavy fighting, perhaps even coming to blows, in their process of trying to choose a candidate.  The best at this time that I can say about the eventual race is that right now, I believe Obama will walk right over anyone who opposes him.

And that is how it should be – and how I want it to be.  And no doubt you will hear quite a lot more about it as the year goes.

Carol Stepp, Austin, TX

About carolstepp

Music is about the most important thing in my life, and I follow a large number of musicians, particularly Irish, Scots, Classical, Crossovers of any of these. I was writing a blog about Celtic Thunder regularly on MySpace, and now I have left them after a year, and will start writing my blogs here. I am 70, retired, living on Social Security, and have a lot of social network fans.
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Political comments

  1. farleftloony says:

    The caliber of the wannabes gives me hope and real assurance that Obama will have a second term , we may even retake the house
    There is the Geckoist,, the Fascist , the hypochristain , and certified LOON
    To just show how far out of touch Romney is did you hear his one liner ” I made a LITTLE speaking, but it wasn’t much” $ 375,000 certainly isn’t much ( to him)

    • carolstepp says:

      I read a really comic article in our Austin American-Statesman yesterday that was comparing what the Republican candidates were wearing. It was quite funny, apparently the only person who dresses to his status is Ron Paul, but the writer ended his article with the comment, “if the candidates are chosen because of what they wear, then Obama will win in a landslide”. I still think he will, but probably not based on his attire. Though it would not surprise me if that actually was the criteria for a few.

  2. Bill says:

    I understand the confusions. Why hasn’t anyone talked about entitlements? Many Americans see them as “our right.”

    • carolstepp says:

      Bill, some of the entitlements are our rights. My social security, for instance, is my right. I paid for it over the years I worked (47 of them). My Medicare is also my right, because it also was paid for over the years. Now my food stamps, and my Medicaid, are not necessarily entitlements, BUT, I get them because the feds themselves set the base for poverty, and my income is below poverty level, as set by the US, so I get the $16 a month for food stamps, and I have Medicaid which takes care of everything that my Medicare does not. It even pays my Medicare premiums for me. My food stamps were up to $112, but they were lowered when I went into assisted housing (city). They should not have been since they are supposed to be based strictly on income, but I don’t mind, since I actually have money to buy groceries now. When I first got the food stamps (and I waited until I was 65), I was so glad to have them because for the three years prior, having been forced into retirement and social security at 62, I was eating pasta and wieners – it was all I could afford, and it caused me to put on a great deal of weight. But my rent at the time, before I got into housing, was so ruinous I could not afford to buy decent food. As it was, I sold off a huge library, and put all my good stuff in the pawn shop, some of which I am still working on getting out of pawn. And thank goodness for Medicare Part D, I get my meds for little cost to me, and I would not have to be on several of my meds had it not been for my poor diet. So I won’t apologize for getting what many call entitlements because it was the greed of a number of folks, as well as my not being able to get work because I was “too old”, that put me in the position to have to get the things which I might not be “entitled” to.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s